• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    On the brightside, the clear fragility and lack of direct connection to real productive forces shows the instability of the present system.

    • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And no matter how many protectionist measures that the US implements we’re seeing that they’re losing the global competition. I guess protectionism and oligarchy aren’t the best ways to accomplish the stated goals of a capitalist economy. How soon before China is leading in every industry?

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This conclusion was foregone when China began to focus on developing the Productive Forces and the US took that for granted. Without a hard pivot, the US can’t even hope to catch up to the productive trajectory of China, and even if they do hard pivot, that doesn’t mean they even have a chance to in the first place.

        In fact, protectionism has frequently backfired, and had other nations seeking inclusion into BRICS or more favorable relations with BRICS nations.