• Eheran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    How is the nuclear sign in any way universally understandable? It is properly by learning it’s meaning.

    • tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s intended to visually represent an atom with radiation emitting away from it.

      It’s not “univeral” in the sense that anyone could understand it, but in the sense that anyone who knows about what radiation is would have a clue - be them people now, or some far-future civilisation stumbling across a nuclear dump site, or aliens. It’s a depiction of what is going on.

      The symbol also uses elements of graphic design that make it feel unwelcoming and hostile even if you have no understanding at all. It’s a design that clearly telegraphs “this is not a good thing”

      Similar for the biohazard sign, which in its strange curves and spines looks almost “mutated”

      • deafboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        I respect all the science and research in hostile design, but then I rember the chilli peppers, just trying to keep safe from mamals by simulating the feeling of fire in their mouths…

        • moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Evolution doesn’t really work that way though. Peppers didn’t evolve spiciness to keep animals away, they essentially randomly developed a mutation that made them unpalatable to most animals, and that increased their odds of survival. It’s not doing X for Y reason, it’s X happening with Y as a consequence.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The design process is actually very interesting to read about and the intentionality (whether you think it’s effective or not) is essentially the scenario that if someone were to stumble across it in 10,000 years they would recognize it is dangerous and leave it alone

      That said you are probably right given there already have been a few notable incidents where people have broken into discarded medical equipment and stolen radioactive sources, poisoning dozens of people in the process