fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomoms rulemander.xyzimagemessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1957arrow-down114
arrow-up1943arrow-down1imagemoms rulemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-squareIllecors@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoThis assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
minus-squareSkunkWorkz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 day agoNo I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.
This assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
No I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.