You’d think a hegemony with a 100-years tradition of upkeeping democracy against major non-democratic players, would have some mechanism that would prevent itself from throwing down it’s key ideology.

Is it really that the president is all that decides about the future of democracy itself? Is 53 out of 100 senate seats really enough to make country fall into authoritarian regime? Is the army really not constitutionally obliged to step in and save the day?

I’d never think that, of all places, American democracy would be the most volatile.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I mean “No man shall hold office who committed insurrection” seems like a mechanism in and of itself.

    Who decides who is an insurrectionist?

    Simple majority in Congress? Well then Congress can just outlaw the minority party

    Supermajority in Congress? Well look at the senate vote for the second impeachment. That doesn’t work either.

    Courts? They have a 6-3 supreme court.

    States? Then we end up with red states blocking democrats from the ballot by falsely declaring them to be insurrectionists.

    Public Opinion? How do you even measure that? Voting? Well look at November 5th.

    Criminal conviction of insurrection? Well trump never got convicted of anything involving insurrection.

    So here we are…