‘It’s too powerful a technology’

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems like even if someone could in theory legally reuse some aspect of AI generated/assisted art, it would be prohibitively difficult or impossible to separate it out from the manually created components or know exactly where the line is legally, so it would be completely impractical to use.

    • millie@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Artists aren’t lawyers and don’t want to be. Except for the ones that are. But that isn’t most of us.

      Artists make art. If you want to look for the people who like to make policy, look to the jackasses in suits who sit around having meetings about meetings all day to justify scalping the work made by actual artists. The same kinds of people who fund stories like this blatantly uninformed hit piece.

      Fuck them and the horse they rode in on.

      At some point the line will have to be discovered, because the use of AI for art isn’t going away. Suits can whine about it all they want. Art doesn’t really care.