• Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think your example with the multiplication tables is a great one. It is important for students to have a understanding of what multiplication is both as a building block of more complex math, and because multiplication is one of the most practical skills we learn in school. Having said that, rote learning of multiplication tables is also a useful skill. By learning the multiplication tables you free up cognitive resources when learning something more complex.

    • lime!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      i don’t know about that, i would prefer to build an intuition. i know people who simply have the entire thing memorized and “look up” the answer when prompted. which of course completely breaks down if you introduce an operand higher than 12.

      • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You need both. Take 1718. Your understanding of multiplication should tell you that this equals 1010+107+108+8*7. Now your rote learning will allow you to calculate this quickly as 100+70+80+56=306.

        • lime!
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          you’ll need to escape the asterisks: \*

          and no, my rote learning has not prepared me for that. nothing like that was ever presented to me. i went from multiplication tables to factorisation and never mentally connected the two. as a result i can’t do factorisation in my head at all, despite doing 80% of a master’s in engineering.

          • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah your education failed you. What I am effectively doing is “factoring” 17*18 into (10+7)(10+8), before working out the parentheses, but it’s easier because you only work with numbers and not with x’s. A nice in-between step towards algebra.

            • lime!
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              yeah that’s what’s so interesting. like obviously i can see the steps with actual numbers but replace with unknowns and it’s 50-50 whether i would be able to do it. and since i work with optimisations every day, i have had to reconstruct this stuff from first principles without a theoretical understanding so i need to go the long way around every time.