• Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    He specifically doesn’t want to hear anything that doesn’t confirm his world view and in being loud about it it’s getting him likes from his in-group which he thinks is all he needs and makes him superior.

    You can see it in the way he responds to everyone with either the idea they fully agree with him or are deserving of indignation.

    Wait till he finds out even his echo chamber doesn’t pass the purity test and God forbid he ever fail it himself.

    Also I swear the amount of small business owners I know in Singapore who agree they live there for a better life is wild if you know anything about the authoritarian lean of Singapore. Grass is always greener and all that.

    • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Who gives a shit about purity tests? Y’all are literally all over the thread going “oh but is it perfect? Thought so, tankies”.

      Also I swear the amount of small business owners I know in Singapore who agree they live there for a better life is wild if you know anything about the authoritarian lean of Singapore.

      Maybe because what business owners consider “less authoritarian” is being better able to exploit your workers? I don’t know how many different ways one can explain this to you

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        You do.

        You go around saying anyone that disagrees with you, even on minor details, is a liberal and insisting that China is a fantastic Communist state. You are setting the bar on purity with no room for disagreement without with taking to insults and acting poorly.

        The purity is that which you are insisting in others not even on the country. I have not even called you or anyone else in here a tankie once but you insist that I did so it okays you to “react” appropriately.

        And how would a local business with a single employee be thinking they could better exploit themselves? Do you not see how you aren’t even cooperating in the conversation? You barge in to shout a lot and see the discourse as productive even if it’s just loud nonsense.

        You don’t even know that I have a 10 year work visa in China and have spent a generous amount of time over there, you have no knowledge of my detainment for giving out a VPN nor do you know about my detainment in Singapore for the same thing. There is nuance and more to the world than just one thing such as workers or economics on broad scale, but it’s easier for you simplify for the sake of the fantasy you wish to have.

        • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’m arguing against people saying that china isn’t perfect ant isn’t communist because it has billionaires, by pointing out the class character of the state and the political apparatus that regularly clamps down on the capitalists (unlike any capitalist state).

          I’m also arguing against libs saying big gubmint bad bc it’s too communist. China is a socialist country, I never claimed it’s a perfect utopia, you just don’t have any angle of attack with facts so you have to put up a fictional one you can throw your “nuanced” platitudes at.