• Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    29 minutes ago

    Huge amounts of low quality websites being posted here now. I’ve never heard of Mint Press news so I looked them up -

    Detailed Report

    Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Pseudoscience, Poor Sources, Failed Fact Checks

    Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-9.1)

    Factual Reporting: LOW (7.8)

    Country: USA

    MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE

    Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

    MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

    Edit - ha ha didn’t realise it was .ml 😂

    I thought I blocked you spastics

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Critical thinking is too difficult, so its best to let zionist bloggers tell you what’s factual. /s

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      MBFC is the lowest quality website around: literally just some random right wing jerk offs opinion. Yet liberals treat it like unquestionable holey scripture because it confirms their bias

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      🤓☝️ uh ackchually my media aggregator website says your website is bad!

      If you want to be a redditor so bad go back to reddit

    • Samsuma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Here’s an exercise for you that may require critical thinking (which evidently, you seem very averse to): Can you list out things that are invalid, dishonest and/or blatantly false in the article? Ensure to quote the parts that fit this category of “invalid, dishonest and/or false” and justify why, while citing sources that you believe to not be in this category.