Summary

Syracuse City Court Judge Felicia Pitts Davis refused to officiate a same-sex wedding, citing religious beliefs.

Another judge, Mary Anne Doherty, performed the ceremony.

Pitts Davis’ actions, considered discriminatory under New York judicial ethics and the Marriage Equality Act, are under review by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s so telling that these religious nut jobs never use their “deeply held beliefs” to feed, house, comfort, protect, and uplift those they are charged with governing.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    7 days ago

    Now someone trace back which republican donor group is propping her up to use this as fodder to ride up to the corrupted Supreme Court?

    • TipRing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      7 days ago

      This play is so obvious. The judge wants to be sued or reprimanded or removed to get the matter to the SCOTUS just so they can rule that gay people can’t get married if any official involved in the process objects on religious grounds.

        • Snapz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 days ago

          You see, there’s you’re problem, you’re operating as if society hasn’t already fucking collapsed. It’s a common coping tactic - keep pretending it’s just another Tuesday while the walls collapse around you.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 days ago

          looks at roe

          looks at Thomas’ opinions used by Cannon

          Yea, I think it’ll be pretty easy for them.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Overturning it with a case where it’s relevant would be easy, this isn’t that case. This is about a state judge being expected to follow state laws. They would have to rule gay marriage is outright unconstitutional, which they didn’t even do for abortion.

  • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 days ago

    So throw her off the bench for gross incompetence and failure to perform her sworn duties. Simple.

  • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 days ago

    These religious nutjobs like to living and choose what parts of the Bible they’ll follow when it’s convenient. Apply their Christian principles to lending money.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Pretty weird for the judge to let their shitty religion decide how love works between two consenting adults.

    • Noite_Etion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Its not weird at all, religious people often use their beliefs to avoid doing their fucking job, whist also judging you.

  • blazeknave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    Okay… My religion says I can’t make my quota?.. I get fired. Public fucking servant?! That’s tax dollars ffs!

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    under review by the state commission on judicial conduct.

    I’m sure the finger wagging they’ll give her will be very firm.

  • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    Since when does anyone claim the right to have a specific judge do the officiating? The couple had someone else do it and no harm.

    • Kayday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Since when does anyone claim the right to have a specific cashier scan their groceries? The black man walked to another lane no harm.

      This is what you sound like.

      • valkyre09@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I can’t understand how it got to the point the couple found out. All the judge had to say was congratulations to them, but another judge was coming to allow her to do another duty then leave smiling.

        Nobody would have been any the wiser and she could have kept whatever belief system she had intact without bothering anybody. Sure she’s still a bigot, but nobody’s big day would have been ruined.

        Instead it looks like she felt the need to declare to the whole world that she objected to the union.

        Weirdo