A coalition of local officials from across the country are calling on Congress to oppose proposed legislation that will allow an increase in the length and weight of large trucks traveling on commercial highways.

“Longer and heavier trucks would cause significantly more damage to our transportation infrastructure, costing us billions of dollars that local government budgets simply cannot afford, compromising the very routes that American motorists use every day.”

  • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    A single, heavier truck is going to be more efficient than two lighter trucks. And create less gridlock.

    I don’t doubt that this has something to do with the driver shortage but that doesn’t mean this is a bad idea. In fact, it might be a good one.

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I say we go all the way and use even smaller numbers of extremely large trucks, and put them on specialized roads made out of two metal rails. I bet the efficiency of these “rail roads” would be far far superior!

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, they are pretty heavily used for anything that needs to go hub to hub on a ‘when it gets there’ schedule. However, I find it ironic that the majority of pro-train individuals complain heavily about cargo trains making the train system worse.

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not the cargo trains that make the system worse, it’s the prioritization of cargo over passenger rail along with lack of investment. If they spent even half the money on rail that they do on automobile roads we’d have one hell of a good rail system.

          The highway system costs 200-400 billion dollars a year split between state and federal government.

          Meanwhile Amtrak gets about 1.5 billion dollars from the federal government.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s pretty simple. More investment to build more robust and more connected lines. High traffic lines could be multiple rails wide, so faster passenger trains (which are time sensitive) can pass slower freight trains.

          The issue with our rail infrastructure is that lines have been reduced over and over. Also, despite legally amtrak being given priority, they rarely do get it. Freight trains are often too long to be able to let them pass, so they are no longer legally required to get out of the way, because there isn’t an alternative for them.

          Freight causes issues with the current system, but it is not required to cause issues. It only causes issues because we have chosen to not invest in improving things.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Road wear scales as a cube of vehicle weight, so unless the heavier trucks are only 4.6% heavier than two trucks they’ll cause more damage to the roads while consuming less fuel and therefore producing less fuel tax revenue which is used to repair the roads.

      • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Road wear scales as a cube of vehicle weight

        Per axle.

        consuming less fuel

        This is a good thing

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, and unless that road weight per axle is only 4.6% higher it’s going to cause more road wear than just using two trucks.

          And consuming less fuel is good, provided we find a way to pay for the increased repairs we’ll need.

          • radix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            The federal diesel tax rate is 24.4 cents/gallon and hasn’t been changed since 1993 [not indexed to inflation], a time period that’s seen other inflation raise prices by some 65-75%.