• shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The fact that this has USB type C as a option for powering it makes me very interested, but the fact that it does not have at least Wi-Fi 6E makes me not interested. So I think I will have to wait for version 2 of this.

    • RandomGen1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      In the us at least, you cannot have 6ghz operation and connectorized antennae like this unit has

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Okay, I didn’t look closely enough at the device to notice that it had connector and 10 is instead of fixed antennas.

    • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Oh come on, don’t knock the router for not being the best access point. That’s not what it’s for.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If I remember correctly, Wi-Fi 6E was finalized in like 2021 or 2022, and it’s 2024 and very close to 2025. So it should be about three years that Wi-Fi 6E has been in the wild. I only have 500 MBPS fiber anyway so I wouldn’t saturate the links but I do want the six gigahertz Wi-Fi band because if I’m going to buy a new router I’m going to probably keep it for like 10 years. I think I purchased my previous router in like 2019 and I’m still using it. My router is an appliance that I only replace when the damn thing breaks pretty much.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I’m saying that your router and access point should be separate devices anyway, especially if you don’t want to replace said router.

          My router doesn’t have wireless at all. I have a dedicated WiFi 6 access point for that, if I want to go up to a newer standard I just replace the AP.

          • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Yeah, fair enough. I’m kind of an intermediate user, because when I think of Access Point and Router, I think of the same device. But yet, I’m definitely a big advocate of open source software and hardware. But I do not self-host very much.

            • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Less about open source, more of just a practical stance. The thing about networking is that standards change all the time, and it’s better to have a single device serve a single role on the network than to cram all those functions into a combo box.

              So an ideal network has a separate router, switch, and access point. Ideally two of each in redundant configurations but that’s not required for most people.