• Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Yeah I can’t imagine choosing to game on a device that has no physical controls and just touchscreen which is what I imagine this device would have to be if it’s foldable.

      It will probably also be over $1000 if it’s a foldable touchscreen and have shitty hardware so may as well get a steam deck if you’re intent is gaming.

      If I want to game on a touchscreen I’ll do it on my phone because it’s convenient. I’m not carrying a second device around for touchscreen gaming.

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        I mean… Nintendo has released several devices with physical buttons that fold. They sold famously well.

        Also, you could read the article. There’s a massive picture of the patent with, shocker, physical buttons.

      • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        some of the emulators I use, when the phone is vertical they put the action on the top half and a bunch of touchscreeny buttons on the bottom. Still not as good as a physical controller, but it will do when the controller is recharging.