For any social network, not just a federated one.

My thoughts: The way it works in big tech social networks is like this:

  1. **The organic methods: **
  • your followee shares something from a poster you don’t follow
  • someone you don’t follow comments on a post from someone you follow
  • you join a group or community and find others you currently don’t follow
  1. The recommendation engine methods: content you do not follow shows up, and you are likely to engage in it based on statistical models. Big tech is pushing this more and more.
  2. Search: you specifically attempt to find what you’re looking for through some search capability. Big tech is pushing against this more and more.

In my opinion, the fediverse covers #1 well already. But #1 has a bubble effect. Your followees are less likely to share something very drastically different from what you already have.

The fediverse is principally opposed to #2, at least the way it is done in big tech. But maybe some variation of it could be done well.

#3 is a big weakness for fediverse. But I am curious how it would ideally manifest. Would it be full text search? Semantic search? Or something with more machine learning?

  • Kichae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Search will never search non-local content. That’s not how search works anywhere. Even Google is searching local content.

    That’s what search engine spiders do. They create local profiles of websites that end up being sorted and searched.

    We have to give up on the idea of having easy and direct access to the whole of thw fediverse. Fefiverse sites don’t even know about every other fediverse site, and they never will.