• Hamartia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Were there not many different tribes? It stands to reason that there could well have been a range of different lifestyles too. Including that described above.

    My point being that other recorded experiences with native americans do not invalidate this rosy reminiscence.

    It is in no way a workable solution to the modern maladies of this fractious over-crowded planet but it does help to have a range of idealised utopias to draw from in our discussions of how to proceed.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Ok. An unsourced meme is not historical fact. It’s disturbing that it’s even taken as valid with no corroborating information, you arguing as if it were true, and using opinion to manufacture “proof” such a “different tribes” and “lifestyles”. There’s plenty of made up bullshit floating around on the internet in pic/text format, why is this one granted any more believability? Do you have a legitimate source indicating any such “utopias” or do you just want to keep making things up?

      • Hamartia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why does it upset you so much? It is, as you say, a meme. Just a meme. It’s not peer reviewed or held to any measurable standard that warrants getting yourself worked up over. It’s not taught in schools or repeated on any serious news platform as fact. It’s just a meme.

        I too doubt if it is real. It’s just entertainment. Just like when I watch a tv show, I can choose to momentarily suspend belief when I engage with it.

        Is it flat out impossible for some native peoples to have had that quoted experience? I don’t think so. I don’t also think it would have been common at all. But not impossible.

        Are you sure that it is not the sentiment of the meme that you are really objecting to rather than it’s credibilty. Why not write a critical analysis of it. It would make for a more interesting conversation.

        For one (speaking from my experience reading about the ‘wild Irish’), there is often a might makes right in the anarchy of these losely connected groups of people that is often brutal. Those at the bottom of the social ladder probably wouldn’t have such a rose tinted overview of it.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          So if I disagree with you I’m “upset”? Now it’s just a meme and not the basis for your theories on native peoples?

          can choose to momentarily suspend belief when I engage with it.

          This is ridiculous. I provided a factual and objective source of information. Now you’re going on about the Irish, grasping at straws, and flat out saying feels before reals. Goddamn no wonder we got trump for president.

          Take a hike.

          • Hamartia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            You’re still angry. And I don’t exactly understand why. You seem angry to me because you are being uncivil and closed minded.

            But why? Do you think that meme is seditious or in some way undermines democracy? Do you think that there are only a limited range of responses to that meme that are acceptable, and you, somehow, are the arbiter?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      My point being that other recorded experiences with native americans do not invalidate this rosy reminiscence.

      I’d actually point to the excepts from Columbus’s own journals, catalogued in Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States” to identify a number of native tribes he initially encountered who were practically childlike in their innocence.

      The Caribbean island peoples were documented in sharp contrast to more imperial mainlanders as extraordinarily passive, initially quite friendly, and devoid of the more rigid hierarchies and institutions common in those more technologically advanced societies.

      The only bit that doesn’t really fit is the horses, which hadn’t arrived from Europe yet

      • Hamartia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Interesting stuff. I think remember hearing about that in the Behindthebastards episode on Columbus.

        The spanish had a similar native experience during an unplanned visit to Ireland in 1517. While there were towns and villages in Ireland at the time, there was still a significant population of wild Irish.

        They spend an marked amount of time talking about the free range boobs that were on show.