cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 hours agoRestart of Three Mile Island tests US appetite for nuclear revivalwww.ft.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1187arrow-down18file-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1179arrow-down1external-linkRestart of Three Mile Island tests US appetite for nuclear revivalwww.ft.comcyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 hours agomessage-square33fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareCOASTER1921@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·5 hours agoFT asking is insane. I’m happy to pay for quality journalism but that’s simply out of reach for most Americans. I’d love to know how their management determined this was an appropriate price.
minus-squareWindyRebel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 hours agoBecause the people who can afford and are willing to pay are a certain demographic. It’s all about personas and marketing testing!
minus-squaresunzu2@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·4 hours agoFT is global capital’s preferred fake news outlet along with WSJ and CNBC. That price is targeted for companies who play people who are part of the club, they will pay. It is not for the plebs beyond reading the headline. They don’t care if you read it.
FT asking
is insane. I’m happy to pay for quality journalism but that’s simply out of reach for most Americans. I’d love to know how their management determined this was an appropriate price.
Because the people who can afford and are willing to pay are a certain demographic.
It’s all about personas and marketing testing!
FT is global capital’s preferred fake news outlet along with WSJ and CNBC.
That price is targeted for companies who play people who are part of the club, they will pay.
It is not for the plebs beyond reading the headline. They don’t care if you read it.