Let’s compose a list of the all shortcomings so that we can address them and eventually hit 100k mau.

  • Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    The fact that many on the internet haven’t gotten past the largest hurdle, creating a Lemmy account.

    We’re currently at 462k created accounts.

    • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      I said this a while ago on another thread, but if I was a Dev on the project I would be working to create a website that automatically signs you up for an instance. The high level concept is instances would opt into this pool, the user would simply put in their username like any regular website, and then the system would create them an account on whichever instance was best for them (maybe based on ping/trying to spread population around).

      This would majorly reduce the barrier to entry in my opinion, because a lot of people just want to browse, and don’t care about the federation aspect at all.

      • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        Which instances would you put into this pool besides lemm.ee and lemmy.zip?

        • lemmy.world is too large
        • sh.itjust.works is a non neutral name (most people probably won’t mind, but some others might be deterred)
        • beehaw.org is behind and deferated
        • lemmy.dbzer0.com andn discuss.tchncs.de have a name that can be hard to remember
        • programming.dev is topic-oriented
        • lemmy.ca, feddit.nl, feddit.org and sopuli.xyz are country/language-oriented
        • lemmy.blahaj.zone is queer-oriented, not sure they want people who don’t support queer people to join
        • other instances are probably not busy enough to have all the communities subscribed

        https://fedidb.org/software/lemmy/ filtered by MAU

        • jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          I guess another problem is, larger instances are more likely to be reliably up, if you randomly signed people up to a smaller instance running in someone’s bedroom thant they switch off at night then that user’s experience is going to be terrible, but if you combat this by only having large instances in that pool then the large instances get larger and smaller instances will essentially freeze at their current size because the main way of signing up would become this portal that assigns you to instances rather than specifically joining an instance. It might encourage the fediverse to become considerably less federated and a lot more centralised.

          • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            There is going to be an equilibrium between the number of users and the number of instances. At the moment, with 22 instances with more than 300 monthly active users, we are doing okay.

    • RagnarokOnline@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 days ago

      This one is my biggest challenge too… I wish there was, like, a “trial” instance that folks were automatically signed up for and then after 30 days they had to switch and find another instance.

      Once you’re in the door it’s lovely, but that first barrier to entry scares people off.