• Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    If you take out the Jack/Rose love story and add some of the Californian’s scenes and a bit in the wireless room, you could edit Cameron’s Titanic down to a pretty good remake of A Night to Remember. He was clearly influenced by it, some scenes are lifted straight from the ANtR narrative even though they are known to be inaccurate (Andrews in the first class smoking room, Smith on the bridge as the ship goes down come to mind).

    I like the Cameron Titanic, actually. The love story notwithstanding, it’s well worth watching for his attention to detail. The reconstruction of the ship was meticulous, and with a few notable exceptions for dramatic license, the account of the sinking is quite accurate (for the information we had at the time - we now know the breakup is incorrect, but at the time it was the best theory) and contains quite a few easter eggs for Titanic nerds. (like me)

    That said… I love A Night to Remember and watch it every year on the anniversary of the sinking. The book is well worth reading, too. Walter Lord assembled his narrative based on correspondence with as many survivors as he could reach - often verbatim as they told it, and it’s really a riveting read.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      Funny, I recommended A Night to Remember elsewhere in this post as a far better film.

      Anyway, I agree with you on the detail. It was very impressive. I just won’t sit through the film to watch it when I can watch A Night to Remember, even if they didn’t know certain details, like the ship splitting in half.

      • Tin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        Yeah, I haven’t actually sat down to watch the 1997 Titanic in a long time, for that reason. A Night to Remember exists. 1997 Titanic breaks in half, but in the wrong place, so they’re both wrong about it ;)

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      The breakup theory is incorrect? So the ship didn’t split in half?

      Did no one ever go down there before the movie was made, or did it break under water?

      • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        No, it did split in half. It just didn’t reach such a steep angle before it did. There’s two great videos by Oceanliner Designs that go in-depth on what the movie got wrong, as well as what likely actually happened during the breakup.

        What the movie got wrong An analysis of the breakup

        There also a video that goes more indepth on what the movies got wrong in general.

        • TBi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          24 days ago

          Any video with 30s clip showing the realistic sinking of the ship? Don’t want to watch a 20 minute video right now.