• CybranM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I assume you meant the opposite of what you wrote. Your question was answered in my previous comment.

    You think we should just stop all industries then?

    • mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sorry for the f word insult.

      You think we should just stop all industries then?

      We live in a capitalist world that is exploiting the planet for profit and will continue to do so until it dies, which scientists are telling us we are coming up on.

      Most of the industries of the world do not exist for the benefit of humans, they exist for the benefit of those who want to rule and hoard resources. We are brought up in a culture they control that tells us their products are important and to desire them.

      Ultimately, I don’t think it’s ok to cause harm to living things and ecosystems to prop up this system. Like, how many people is it ok to kill so that we have cell phones? Rockets are just a particularly egregious example way of thinking, just like fashions shows are. So yes, I think if our species expects to exist in 100 years on a planet that still has forests and whales, it will require the end most industries we know today. Degrowth of some sort is the only way forward that doesn’t end in disaster. Rocket use at the level of 2024 is simply not compatible with sustainability.