Talk of Staten Island secession is back in the news. Nicole Malliotakis, the Republican congresswoman representing the borough and parts of southern Brooklyn, said that the migrant crisis should prompt Staten Islanders to break away from New York City entirely.

“If you’re not gonna do your job, mayor, then let Staten Island secede,” she said at a rally last week opposing a small shelter for asylum-seekers that city officials opened on the island. “We didn’t vote for your policies. We should not be subjected to your policies, and we’re gonna keep on turning out. Let Staten Island secede.”

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    43·
    10 months ago

    To be clear, I think they’re just talking abour seceding from New York state, not the USA which is what Texas was talking about. I think Staten Island is advocating to become their own state, although I might be wrong.

    • dhork@lemmy.worldEnglish
      28·
      10 months ago

      You are wrong, this is about seceding from New York City. NYC is currently composed of five boroughs, and Staten Island is one of them. So they want to separate from the city (and all that sweet Wall St. Tax revenue) and pay for their local government themselves.

      Although I wouldn’t be surprised if they thought about leaving New York State, too. Maybe New Jersey would take them. Not sure if they would consider that an improvement though. Perhaps they should become an exclave of Florida, most of them will retire there anyway so it saves a step.

        • geekworking@lemmy.world
          2·
          10 months ago

          Many NJ residents would support the idea of removing the bridges and building a wall along Arthur Kill to keep out SI refugees.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        6·
        10 months ago

        OK, so this is even less like Texas. There’s a pretty big difference between “We should secede from the US” and “We should be our own city outside this other cities jurisdiction”.

        • KoboldCoterie@pawb.socialEnglish
          6·
          10 months ago

          It’s obviously a difference of scale, but the point I was trying to make is that both groups talk about secession because they don’t like specific policies that are affecting them in ways they don’t like, while seemingly ignoring the broader macro-scale problems that they would cause for themselves if they actually went through with it. (The article is specifically about these problems as they relate to Staten Island seceding from NYC.)