• Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    What exactly gives your idea weight? What is your idea to change from the current system to a better one again? I’m sure you have a proven model for this right? Or do you know just as little as I do about how to reform the two party system into something better?

    • Knightfox@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I don’t have a novel idea, I’m not trying to change the two party system that exists. The fact that the current two party system has been in existence since 1932 and the overall structure has existed since 1854 is what gives it weight and value. It’s continued existence is what proves the model. The burden of proof is on those who wish to change the system, not on those participating in the current one.

      People have wanted to end the two party system basically from it’s inception, yet despite that there has never been significant enough traction to make that happen. At best detractors have replaced one of the two parties, but the overall number of parties and their operation has remained the same.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        So you see the problem here right? You think its impossible to change the system, and I think its very possible. Maybe with more years I’ll slide closer to your position though.