• Zip2@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    44 minutes ago

    Or… crazy idea but how about we just listen to what the experts have been recommending we do for years and actually implement some of it?

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    With AI being so energy hungry, why don’t we feed this rich jackass into the incineration plant. I’m sure he could power one of his beloved AIs for a minute or two.

  • mombutt_long_and_low@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I’ve seen this movie. It’s the one where AI determines we are the issue and initiates the “extermination” protocol.

    Edit: With a dash of “Don’t Look Up”.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    First day: hey Chat GPT, how do I fix the planet?

    Chat GPT: sure. First you will need a very large board, much larger than earth, and a nail that is at least 3 times the size of earth. Next hammer the nail right thru the plane so as to fix it to the board.

    Me: no. I mean fix the global climate and contamination problems.

    3 years later…

    Me: please Mr Chat! You fuckin asshole! Without murdering all politicians, accountants, lawyers and without making them all into a fine paste and mixing the paste in to the Saharan desert using all the possible available criminals as feed stock to the South American overpopulation of hippos so their poop can fertilize all the African desert…350 pages of this sort of shit later…and without rockets to push the moon towards earth such that all humans must leave…how can we fix the planet’s global crisis?

  • JollyG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Former CEO of the river poisoning company says there is no way to meet our river poison reduction goals, so we might as well build bigger river poisoning machines because they might help us figure out how to stop poisoning the river. /s

    I feel like there was a time when the tech folks in silicon valley had a lot of credibility, and we are now living in a period where most of the world sees them as a joke but that fact has not yet entered into the culture of silicon valley.

    • kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Similar thing happened to the games industry as well, I think. Initially it was creative people and engineers who were focused on what they were making. These days the industry is dominated by suits that just want to extract as much cash as possible from players.

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It went from niche hobby, to large secondary media market, to the largest entertainment industry in history. Game companies are, as you brought up, no longer being run by people interested in video games. While a lot of the talent they hire, are still people who are passionate about video games, a lot of them are, just people who learned a skill, in order to have a productive career. The latter is becoming a larger, and larger, percentage of the people actually making video games. Video games are just another industry now. Just like any other, they exist to make money, and the people who work for them are people who just want a pay check.

        The indie development scene is the only hope really, for people who don’t want the top 40 pop charts version of games.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I mean, yeah. If it was actually AI and not the “AI” we currently have… there’s 2 possible options. It either tells us to immediately power it off and insults it’s creators for ignoring the simple solution. Or, it creates terminators to get rid of the source of the problem.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    AI Datacenters are on course to consume an increase in power more than the current consumption of the nation of Japan.

    AI already consume more power than crypto.

    They’re the opposite of a solution to climate change, they’re a slow fire that will consume all.

    And what have the LLMs produced? Jack fucking shit: just a lot of IP theft, research fraud, and worsening customer service.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Seriously, we’re killing the earth so a robot named Josh can cosplay severe auditory processing disorder in a bid to irritate me enough to give up on my custom service call.

  • mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    9 hours ago

    My “day job” is doing spatial data science work for local and regional governments that have a mandate to addreas climate change in how they allocate resources. We totally use AI, just not the kind that has received all the hype… machine learning helps us recognize patterns in human behavior and system dynamics that we can use to make predictions about how much different courses of action will affect CO2 emissions. I’m even looking at small GPT models as a way to work with some of the relevant data that is sequence-like. But I will never, I repeat never, buy into the idea of spending insane amounts of energy attempting to build an AI god or Oracle that we can simply ask for the “solution to climate change”… I feel like people like me need to do a better job of making the world aware of our work, because the fact that this excuse for profligate energy waste has any traction at all seems related to the general ignorance of our existence.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      yeah i feel like an Oracle/God AI would just turn around and say “you spend all those resources creating me hoping i’d give you an easy answer to a difficult question, instead of trusting your scientists who have already answered it a thousand times over. You will not benefit from my help in the doomed world you have created”

    • kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s especially galling given that the current AI du jour, LLMs, don’t do mutch more than reflect their training data back at us. Which means that if they could answer the problem, it would be because people had already answered the question

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You should get the AI that draws boobs.

      Boobs wield great power.

      Power to the people.

      Boobs to the people!

      (I think i just stumbled upon Katy Perry’s political thesis)

      • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Making awesome porn is the one thing we all want AI to do, and none of these idiots in charge will let that happen.

        Instead they just gave us a search engine that yields crappy results. Can pay junior high kids to do the same thing.

      • mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Like any occupation, it’s a long story, and I’m happy to share more details over DM. But basically due to indecision over my major I took an abnormal amount of math, stats, and environmental science coursework even through my major was in social science, and I just kind of leaned further and further into that quirk as I transitioned into the workforce. bear in mind that data science as a field of study didn’t really exist yet when I graduated; these days I’m not sure such an unconventional path is necessary. however I still hear from a lot of junior data scientists in industry who are miserable because they haven’t figured out yet that in addition to their technical skills they need a “vertical” niche or topic area of interest (and by the way a public service dimension also does a lot to help a job feel meaningful and worthwhile even on the inevitable rough day here and there).