youTellMe@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoEveryday we stray further from industry standardslemmy.worldimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1187arrow-down11
arrow-up1186arrow-down1imageEveryday we stray further from industry standardslemmy.worldyouTellMe@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoIf that’s a pass through, that’s bad. If that’s used for authentication, authorization, credential limiting, or rate limiting, then sure.
minus-squaresebsch@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoThere is no context in this world validating this level of unsanitized SQL. Even for internal use this is bad, since it bypasses the auth of server and dbms.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoThat is a very good point.
If that’s a pass through, that’s bad.
If that’s used for authentication, authorization, credential limiting, or rate limiting, then sure.
There is no context in this world validating this level of unsanitized SQL. Even for internal use this is bad, since it bypasses the auth of server and dbms.
That is a very good point.