Found this post super informative as it relates to Mastodon, and thought Lemmy might also benefit from this perspective. I’m not sure I share his optimism, but his points seem sound to dampen some of the alarm bells over Meta joining the Fediverse.

  • august_senpai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    IMHO this is 100% the plan. If they play their cards right they stand to take out two birds with one stone (heh). They’ve already paid celebrities to be on there.

    Still, this can only happen if Threads gets massive enough relative to the rest of the fediverse that the incompatibility doesn’t hurt them equally.
    …that is to say, it’s all pretty likely, unless other strong competitors show up with ActivityPub support.

    • SamC@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think Meta really gives a shit about the Fediverse. They are hoping to take out Twitter though, and the Fediverse could be collateral damage.

        • Vlyn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Marketing and content boost for the start maybe? Mastodon has come up a lot recently (hell, even in local radio), so Meta can use this to promote their own product. And already have content right there for users joining Threads, it’s not a blank slate.

          After the initial boost and when sucking up millions of users they can just defederate and have their Facebook (or rather Twitter) 2.0.

        • SamC@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Probably partly to avoid regulatory scrutiny. They can say they’re not being monopolistic (even though they 100% are) because they’re embracing open standards.

          That’s why they’re not launching in the EU.