• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    What?

    There was one there for 9 months before this one showed up, and another is probably already on its way if not there already.

    9 month rotations aren’t even that long or abnormal

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The point is there are always rotations. People always like to give meaning to them, but there always rotations

    • Of course. This is actually explained in the article,

      Omar said the move suggests a reallocation of priorities, particularly as Washington addresses security threats in the Indo-Pacific, where China and Russia have been expanding their influence through major naval exercises.
      “It is important to interpret this as part of a broader recalibration of military resources, rather than a reduction in U.S. engagement,” Omar said.

      So they’re not leaving the Middle East, just popping out as something more urgent came up in Asia-Pacific, but they or a suitable replacement will be back.