I’m playing whack a mole constantly, blocking all these anime subs!

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Not when that thing has dozens of communities for every little nuance a genre can have. For example:

    • t�m@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Block the instance

      Edit: I love anime but my response was for those who don’t. If they want less then subscribe to the local ones and block the anime instances that aren’t local

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I resent that.

        Please don’t go around commenting things that will make readers think “moe” means something it doesn’t.

        And we have different ideas of what “majority” means: !officemoe@ani.social, !thiccmoe@ani.social, !fitmoe@lemmy.world.

        My reasons for setting up the communities are explicitly non-pornographic, and even the quite sexy content is not the kind anyone faps to.

        Its about charachter art that is adorable and compelling in a way that provokes attachment. Not arousal, or at least not just that.

        The newest !smolmoe@ani.social specifically does not allow lewd content at all, even though it includes adult characters, because I know people like you would instantly make it weird.

        And it is weird, but not in the fucked up way you’re thinking of.

      • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m with you on this. That may not be the intent, but it sure as hell is the vibe they give off.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          What “vibe”? The only descriptive words this person used are “worst” and “loli” and the obvious extrapolation there is a beyond serius accusation.

          If you can acknowledge it’s not the “intent”, then why the fuck are you still “with” someone who seems to think that judging anime fans together with the absolute worst of humanity, is anywhere close to reasonable?

          • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 days ago

            I absolutely didn’t acknowledge that it isn’t the intent, I said it may not be.

            I absolutely think that is the intent and I find those communities to be gross and have them all blocked.

            You are so weirdly defensive about it. Almost like you know a lot of people find it highly questionable and they may have a point. If you think every anime fan is into that crap, you are very sorely mistaken, and if you don’t, you are using inapplicable generalizations to make a point and that’s just deceptive.

            • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              I know it’s an unfortunate reality for anime fans to be lumped in with pedos, and I shut it down the best I can wherever I find it. How the fuck did you get to an interpretation where I’m perpetrating that kind of thinking?

              I absolutely think that is the intent and I find those communities to be gross and have them all blocked.

              If you think every anime fan is into that crap, you are very sorely mistaken,

              How can you hold those two views simultaneously? Those communities aren’t small, are you saying their entire userbases are the worst of the worst?

              and if you don’t, you are using inapplicable generalizations to make a point and that’s just deceptive.

              What? If you think this, you’re wrong, if you don’t, you’re also wrong? Which is it?

              Are you saying that I’m pushing the idea that NONE of them are pedos, as if I’m ignoring the probability that at least some of them are?

              And it’s hardly “wierdly defensive” of me to speak up when I probably created most of the communities you’re shitting on.

              And as that creator, I can straight up tell you, it’s not the “intent”.