• AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean the fact that the 3 of you have a particularly similar aggressive nature and after leaving 1 post all came here to keep up the exact same kind of bitchiness is not helping your argument.

    Beaver started banning people for downvoting posts. A fellow mod reached out to Beaver to say that had not been the policy and if they wanted that to be the policy going forward the mods would need to discuss it. Beaver then ignored the request to discuss the new policy that Beaver arbitrarily decided on. The issue here seems to be Beaver, period.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      51
      ·
      3 months ago

      Aggressive? Gasp. BITCHINESS? I am wounded. But I still love you.

      Would you care to assay on what justification exists to demod me?

      • AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well I’m not a mod and I didn’t demod you, but from my opinion of how it played out A, you immediately jumped to Beavers defense and said you didn’t have a problem banning people for downvoting, B, immediately tried to downplay them not responding to the mod request to discuss that action, C, based on how you’re responding here sound completely unfit to be a mod which should require a certain level of maturity, and of course D the possibility that you’re an alt.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          28
          ·
          3 months ago

          Thanks. Interesting thoughts.

          A) is an opinion and it was stated as an opinion, since the post served in place of the discussion that was skipped. I feel justified in sharing my opinion about the direction I want the community to take. I can’t force my views on anyone, and it seems amazingly insecure to respond to that with a unilateral de-mod.

          B) was a request for patience and discussion before people started de-modding each other. But okay, let’s call it “downplaying” for the sake of argument. I don’t see how such downplaying amounts to justification to de-mod me.

          C) I can’t respond to but I do find it rather uncharitable. If you can give an example, I’d appreciate that. And D) I can never assure someone who wishes to believe otherwise.

          When it comes down to it, it sounds like you are saying the other mod was justified in de-modding me because I voiced disagreement with his choices. Plus a bunch of other stuff about me just plain not deserving to be a mod for reasons I admit I don’t grasp; that I’m just intrinsically deserving of being de-modded. Have I got it?