• kofe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Two friends of mine had perpetrators walk up and empty their clips into them. The smaller friend didn’t make it, but the larger one did miraculously survive with 8 bullets in his torso. I’d be morbidly curious to see if there was research supporting that the extra mass made the difference

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        I mean, there’s statistically more area without a critical organ/blood vessel to be hit. Plus you have more blood, so you can lose more in total.

        I think the difference would be small, especially compared to other variables though.

    • BlackDragon@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      You might be surprised. Some people get shot 20 times and walk away without any irreparable damage. It’s all effectively random.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      it depends on where you get hit, unless you get hit directly in a main artery, or dont get tended to quick enough, you’ll more than likely be fine given enough time.

    • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Sorry, why /s? Cops aren’t even particularly good(or safe) shots. I would be more worried about them hitting another bystander in their attempts to shoot me.

      I’m not saying I would enjoy being shot, but statistically, about two-thirds of gun-shot victims survive(source: the Brady campaign), and, mass of jello that I am, I am in pretty good health since my time wiring barges up over the last year.

      That said, this is assuming I happen to be armed and choose to put myself in harm’s way, which is another consideration where I would prefer to be harmed vs others. Odds are good it would be because I chose to do something objectively stupid, versus others whose only choices are to run, hide, or confront their attckers un-armed and otherwise un-prepared.

      • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        “I can maybe take a bullet or three” sounded like such over the top bravado I was hoping it was meant tongue in cheek.

        Don’t get me wrong though I was just commenting on that sentence. I am not meaning to undermine your point about police and their (lack of) aim.

        • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Opposite of Bravado. I see myself as disposable vs most people until shown different, and most people I know who say such things as I have here and mean them seem to feel the same way about themselves. A mistake I don’t live to learn from(or learn of) is less terrifying than a failure to do right by others.

          I’m not saying I definitely won’t just hide, cry, piss and shit myself, but I didn’t do any of that(until hours later) the last few times I had guns pointed at me, and no, I don’t mean by friends or due to personal shenanigans(unless you count signing on certain government forms). It has been over 15 years since the last time though.