US president also to seek constitutional amendment to limit immunity for presidents and various officeholders

Joe Biden will announce plans to reform the US supreme court on Monday, Politico reported, citing two people familiar with the matter, adding that the US president was likely to back term limits for justices and an enforceable code of ethics.

Biden said earlier this week during an Oval Office address that he would call for reform of the court.

He is also expected to seek a constitutional amendment to limit immunity for presidents and some other officeholders, Politico reported, in the aftermath of a July supreme court ruling that presidents have broad immunity from prosecution.

Biden will make the announcement in Texas on Monday and the specific proposals could change, the report added.

  • RubyRhod@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 个月前

    The entire system is beyond antiquated. Coupled with bureaucratic tendency to be self serving, leads me to believe “reformation” will look more like slow death, and further declining services.

    I see no reason for optimism along the lines of “system reform”, and history has no examples I can think of. Shit just gets worse and worse till people start killing people and try some new systems.

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 个月前

      Suffrage didn’t require violent overthrow of the entire system, neither did the New Deal, neither did the Civil Rights movement, neither did Medicare, neither did Gay Rights. No nothing is “solved”, but everything is better than it was in 1900.

      “IDK, maybe War will fix it” is far more unhelpful than working to make positive changes.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 个月前

        Ah, yes. The famously incrementalist New Deal and Medicare. The Civil Rights Movement? Incrementalism is setting a timetable for another man’s freedom. We only got gay marriage because the courts did what the legislature was too incrementalist to feel like doing.

      • RubyRhod@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 个月前

        Sufferage, civil rights etc aren’t institutions.

        'idk, war will fix it" is a lazy-ass takeaway, but ok.

        • turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 个月前

          You’re right, they’re fundamental changes across multiple institutions.

          “I can’t think of examples” is a pretty lazy justification for “the only way out is violence”.