cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/536301

Archived link

The Russia’s State Social University (RSSU) has launched a “social rating” platform that claims to build a person’s “social portrait” with possible applications in future government policies.

Named “We,” the platform promises to determine a user’s comparative “social status” based on a survey that includes questions about income, family status, benefits, creditworthiness, criminal record, lifestyle and state awards, among others.

“The social rating figures don’t affect [a person’s] life, the availability of services or the career trajectory in any way,” RSSU said on the platform’s website. “But who knows what these figures will mean for you in the future?”

Observers on social media compared the platform’s name “We” to the highly influential 1921 dystopian novel of the same name by Russian author Yevgeny Zamyatin. [The novel “We” describes a world of harmony and conformity within a united totalitarian state. It inspired British author George Orwell to write his own novel, “Nineteen Eighty-Four”, which was published in 1949.]

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 个月前

    What’s wrong with RSS-- Oh. Well, Putinism is opposite of communism.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 个月前

      One could argue that the USSR as a dictatorship is not much different than modern Russia as a dictatorship, and that claims of communism contradict the reality of the Stalin era, but there are certainly a lot of nuance that I’m avoiding with such a statement.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 个月前

        One could argue that the USSR as a dictatorship is not much different than modern Russia as a dictatorship

        Totalitarian and autoritarian dictatorships work differently. USSR promised better future and mostly delivered with occasional purges during Stalin era, while Putinism promises stagnation at best. First was ultrareformist, while second is ultraconservative, even regressional. First collapsed from stagnation of 80-ies, second is still going.

        and that claims of communism contradict the reality of the Stalin era

        Indeed, Stalin era is opposite of being soviet(parlamentary) and socialist.