OnlyFans billboards ruled 'not overtly sexual' by UK ad watchdog
www.euronews.com
Eliza Rose Watson's OnlyFans billboards have been cleared. "If a gambling or alcohol company can run their ads, which have far more devastating impacts, why not me?"
  • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.eeEnglish
    111·
    1 year ago

    She’s advertising her ability to titillate, not her personality or intrinsic value and self-worth. Even with your edit, you’re still equating the persona she adopts for her business with her value as a person.

    • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zipEnglish
      37·
      1 year ago

      The ability to titillate IS an intrinsic value, a human one at that. You’re probably just sour that you don’t feel you have that ability, so you want to deny the existence and power of the ability to titilate on a human value basis.

      • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.eeEnglish
        7·
        1 year ago

        Projecting much?

        I don’t have any personal desire to do any sex work. But women who are less conventionally attractive or who don’t feel confident on camera are not any less valuable than those who do. You’re equating a woman’s value as a human to her sex appeal and that’s disgusting.

        • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zipEnglish
          14·
          1 year ago

          You don’t need to do sex work to be a human and appreciate the human experience of being titilated or titillating someone else. It’s a wonderful part of the human experience.

          You keep insisting that you know what I’m talking about, for whatever fucking reason, and you’re consistently wrong. Why are you like this?

          Stop putting your words in my mouth, they taste like shit

      • Arrakis@lemmy.worldEnglish
        41·
        1 year ago

        Wow, you really went directly from “possibly just a poorly written comment” to “actually is just an absolute cunt”, didn’t you?