• Woht24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Everyone is going on about this as anti disability, but why does a disability entitle you to a service that’s paid?

    Unpaid Spotify sucks, full stop, no matter what part of you works or doesn’t.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I would say, it because the lyrics aren’t something Spotify made. No one’s picking up Spotify because only Spotify has lyrics. Spotify isn’t writing the songs. Regardless of what someone might think of Spotify or Spotify free, it’s withholding something that they have that they didn’t make from people that perhaps need it. It’d be like if broadcast TV or any on demand video service (YouTube, Disney, Netflix, etc.), said hey you didn’t pay no more closed captions for you (where a free version is applicable, of course).

      If Spotify wants to put stuff behind a paywall it can be features of the platform.

      My personal opinion is Spotify sucks, full stop. The CEO is a real piece of work. This just goes on the pile of reason Spotify sucks.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      but why does a disability entitle you to a service that’s paid?

      why would you limit the ability to use lyrics though? It’s the same shit that every big article tabloid is doing “pay us five dollar a month and we will show you our articles, that we think are good” after showing you like three, in four months for free.

      Either give people access to the service, or don’t, don’t play the bullshit of “well actually, here’s a free sample”

    • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      They’re lyrics, intentionally making the service worse for people with hearing disabilities is ableist.