• RaoulDook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Nope, completely serious.

    Maybe it’s time you realized that what you’re saying is a conspiracy theory, literally. That is what the trumptards do, as they are addicted to turning everything they’re worried about into a conspiracy theory against them. But not everything is a conspiracy, most things are not.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      If you think that SCOTUS is not signaling the kinds of cases they want to get (at, say, Federalist Society meetings and speeches), you’re not paying attention.

      The electors plot and preparation for the J6 coup attempt were also conspiracies.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        With the Big Lie election conspiracy and Jan. 6th we had clear indications visible to the public and documented communications outlining their conspiracies.

        What you’re promoting now is a conspiracy theory that Louisiana lawmakers are conspiring with the Supreme Court justices to legalize Christian theocracy. Where is the documentation to back up your conspiracy theory? Can you list any examples of publicly visible collusion, communications between those parties?