Is there a reason why? Less funding? Web devs don’t make the pages Firefox friendly? Since the user base is smaller, they just don’t care?

  • NoiseColor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    11 days ago

    The number of people who act like that is negligible. We tested for that.

    We don’t see it as that we are sloppy but that Firefox is not a good browser. We came to that conclusion because no other browser acts like that.

    • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Don’t you think that it may be because Firefox is pretty much the only browser using a different engine that Chromium? There are literally two major browser engines, and you’re developing for one them. Ofc everything else will act like Chromium, because they are Chromium for the most part.

      • NoiseColor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        11 days ago

        That’s all really nice. But the fact is, we use what works. It’s a pragmatic decision. They’re are so few Firefox users and on the end issues are not very common.

        • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          The number of Edge users is only a few % more, do you skip that too? Just check Chrome and Safari and call it a day?

          As someone that uses only Firefox and knows others who do, this really surprises me. If a website is broken on Firefox then it’s shitty webdev work and I’ll find another store.

            • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              Yes, Edge has transitioned to using their own forked version of Chromium under the hood, but they make enough changes that it’s necessary to test for. It’s not like Cromite that takes Chromium and removes some things and change configs. They modify core components of the engine itself.

          • NoiseColor@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 days ago

            Everything works fine in edge. Only Firefox has issues.

            Users don’t care why that is. If their app doesn’t work they won’t use this niche browser that very few people use.

            • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              Funny, we get more complaints about DuckDuckGo browser than anything else, and that’s one of the few we don’t test on. I know this because I make it a point to have someone from CS tell me about consistent pain points users are having. I wonder how many complaints about Firefox not working your customer service team is getting daily and you just don’t hear about it because they’ve been told to tell users “just say Firefox isn’t a supported browser and to try installing Chrome.”

              You should ask someone in CS. Whichever agent bullshits the least (not the manager) - you might learn something.

              Almost 3/10 people accessing your sites are using Firefox. All those “images not loading right or whatever” are probably blatant to them, making them think “wow, what an absolute shit website.”

              3 out of 10.

              • NoiseColor@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 days ago

                Im grateful for you suggestions and your calls for me to learn something. I’m sure they are well meaning and not as patronising as they sound at first.

                The facts are : we don’t get many Firefox users. As far as we know most things are functional if not 100% visually correct. We don’t tell anyone not to use Firefox. I personally have stopped using Firefox because of broken apps (not mine specifically).

                I don’t need to defend my position here. I don’t care why apps are not working, they just aren’t and I need them. Anyone can scream and cry how this is not firefoxes fault - nobody cares while the apps still aren’t running.

    • Quintus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      We don’t see it as that we are sloppy but that Firefox is not a good browser. We came to that conclusion because no other browser acts like that.

      Your views seem to be very narrow despite being a developer.

            • Quintus@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              That my view is narrow

              Yes. Your view is narrow. You do not care about the technical details and just label Firefox as “bad/broken” because you do not know how to work with it. That is a pretty narrow view. You do not care about the idealogical reasons that people bring up in here either.

              and that developers somehow can’t have narrow views.

              I am expecting a person that is talented enough to be a developer to not have narrow views.

              • NoiseColor@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                That’s a strawman. It is not like that at all and I never said it was. I even specifically said that I know the reason it is like it is. I do know how to work with it. And no, I have an ideology, something I mentioned many times : I’m a pragmatist.

                Many developers have narrow views. Probably most have.

    • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Funny enough this ‘slop’ is compliance, but hey you seem to think you’re mega dev supreme so I’m sure you already knew that