I know, the platform isn’t ready, the platform needs more creators, the platform has technical improvements to do…We could have said the same for Lemmy before the Reddit blackout, the same for Mastodon on Twitter.

The main limitation I see at the moment are PeerTube instances, badly communicating, from what I’ve been able to realize, and there are no reference instances as it was for Lemmy.

#viralhashtag

  • Danileonis @lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never heard. We shouldn’t worry about what some creators want to do, and we certainly shouldn’t sponsor yet another centralized platform.

      • pragmakist@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Newbies, as in creators who aren’t good, yet, are going to go whatever platform that they can actually get on.

        At the moment that’s a self-hosted Peertube or Youtube.

      • Danileonis @lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        For the usual two pennies related to traffic? You make money on related third-party platforms, it’s pointless to focus on this as much as it’s useful to support a truly open platform.

        • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nebula is subscribed based, 5$ per viewer.

          The money is split among creators based on the view time of the viewer.

          It’s going to be hard to go against that platform, that is favorable to them