• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    15 days ago

    CRTs perfectly demonstrate engineering versus design. All of their technical features are nearly ideal - but they’re heavy as shit, turn a kilowatt straight into heat, and take an enormous footprint for a tiny window. I am typing this on a 55" display that’s probably too close. My first PC had a 15" monitor that was about 19" across, and I thought the square-ass 24" TV in the living room was enormous. They only felt big because they stuck out three feet from the nearest wall!

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 days ago

      The heavy part truly cannot be overstated. I recently got a tiny CRT, not even a cubic foot in size. It’s about the same weight as my friends massive OLED TV. Of course, OLED is particularly light, but still. It’s insane!

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        15 days ago

        And it’s a vacuum tube. How does nothing weigh this much?!

        Plasma screens weren’t much better, at first. I had a 30" one circa 2006, maybe three inches thick, and it you’d swear it was solid metal. A decade later we bought a couple 32" LCD TVs, then a few more because they were so cheap, and the later ones weighed next to nothing. Nowadays - well, I walked this 55" up and down a flight of stairs by myself, and the only hard parts were finding somewhere to grab and not bonking any walls.