qaz@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agoMaybe we can get good IPv6 support nowlemmy.worldimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1492arrow-down113file-text
arrow-up1479arrow-down1imageMaybe we can get good IPv6 support nowlemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square65fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareRecallMadness@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·6 months agoCGNAT is good. One more layer of obfuscation between me and the internet. Sucks for those wanting to run services from home I guess.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·6 months agoWhat is actually happening is that governments still spy, but it’s on everyone behind that address. People really need to stop pretending IPv4’s flaws are good things.
minus-squareconfusedbytheBasics@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·6 months agoCGNAT sucks any time you want a reliable link to anyone else behind a NAT. Multiplayer games, p2p sharing, video calls all are less reliable.
CGNAT is good. One more layer of obfuscation between me and the internet.
Sucks for those wanting to run services from home I guess.
What is actually happening is that governments still spy, but it’s on everyone behind that address.
People really need to stop pretending IPv4’s flaws are good things.
CGNAT sucks any time you want a reliable link to anyone else behind a NAT. Multiplayer games, p2p sharing, video calls all are less reliable.