For example, could alternative terms like “carbon reducing” and “carbon increasing” make it more clear and avoid misinterpreting which means which?

  • ryan@the.coolest.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How about “positive carbon negativity” and “negative carbon positivity”? As a bonus, this allows us extra terms such as “negative carbon negativity” and “positive carbon positivity” which can be similarly confused for each other!

    (On a more serious note, “carbon reducing” and “carbon increasing” are good.)