What I have learned:

  • Russia has already won the Ukraine war
  • Which NATO started
  • A lot of people in the West think that Ukraine should surrender
  • Also Ukraine was the world’s main provider of CSAM
  • Also Ukraine is exploited by the West but if they can unite with Russia then their economy and everything else will finally be alright

It’s literally like a bizarro world and everyone is over there agreeing with it. I’m genuinely confused by, who even are these people (what is the mixture of Russian bots / Russian-aligned ordinary people / confused Westerners / some other explanation.)

  • Belastend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    that line of reasoning essentially makes every single US invasion ok. and every single oppression okay. Because threats work and fuck you for being weaker.

    • arymandias@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      Accepting how the world works is not the same as saying it’s moral.

      If someone threatens to shoot you, you saying it’s immoral is not a practical defense, unless there is some kind of higher power like a justice system with a police to enforce it. But the entire point of international politics is that such a force does not exist, just countries with interests.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 days ago

        I mean the evidence exists that NATO is a substantially higher power here

        Also, as I said, there’s a huge difference between “I know it’s not an ideal outcome but I’m scared and want to save my skin” - I won’t say someone’s always wrong for saying that, by any means - and saying to someone else who’s fighting and suffering to defend themselves “I know it’s not an ideal outcome but you should be scared, and accept it to save your skin.” It’s like cowardice by proxy. Especially while they’re winning.

        • arymandias@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          15 days ago

          NATO is still a collection of nation states with interests, being powerful does not mean you can be trusted. (As the US has shown multiple times)

          The people actually fighting this war, don’t want to, they need to be forcibly conscripted by the Ukrainian government, I have met multiple people that can no longer renew their pasport because the Ukrainian government (and western governments by extension) want them to die at the front.

          And finally Ukraine is losing, and probably always was, the economic and manpower difference is just too big. There was a point in the summer of 2022 where Ukraine had a position to get a deal on relatively good terms, and there actually was a peace process going on. But somehow this broke down, I’ve heard rumors that it was the UK or the US that convinced/coerced Zelensky to walk away. I really hope that isn’t true because that would mean they have a lot of blood on their hands, and mostly Ukrainian.

          • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            15 days ago

            The plot thickens

            Ukrainians I know do not agree with your assessment of blame, to put it mildly

            Which direction is the front line moving over the course of the last year? I am curious what your picture is of the reality on the ground. Before the US aid package came through, it was 100% fair to say Ukraine was losing or on the verge of starting to lose, but now is very different on any time scale you could select. In my reality at least. Why do you say they are losing?

            Follow up question, where do you get your information? From media (which?), from Lemmy, where?

            • arymandias@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              15 days ago

              https://www.ft.com/content/d7e95021-df99-4e99-8105-5a8c3eb8d4ef

              https://youtu.be/slkn2-N3oR0?si=d9Z_4KEvKS5kYXjp

              If you read between the lines of ft articles it becomes quite clear that the manpower problem is almost insurmountable, but there are also other articles from nyt or Dutch or German mainstream media that try to package it positively but can not hide the underlying problems. And then there is John Mearsheimer who gives a higher level overview, that to me sketches quite a clear picture of Ukraines prospects.

              Plus I like to listen to “war nerd radio” podcast. It’s not a news source perse, but they discuss the Ukraine war sometimes and they seem to be better at predicting what is to come than most news papers. For example they were rightfully quite skeptical about the great summer offensive of 2023 whereas other sources were promising the conquest of Crimea.

              • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                15 days ago

                war nerd radio

                Holy shit holy shit

                Is that Gary Brechner? I had no idea he was even still around, if it is; I liked him quite a lot, like a million years ago

                You are citing people I generally agree with, but I do not agree with what Mearsheimer is saying here. You’re also pointedly ignoring my question about how the front line is moving.

                Just to take what I think of Mearsheimer’s points in lightning round:

                • He talked about striking the homeland and escalation – the US’s approval for strikes inside Russia is very limited, for exactly this reason
                • He talks about S-400s mooting any strikes anyway, when Ukraine has been blowing up S-400s. They don’t seem to be this dominating force for defending even themselves let alone the area where they’re placed
                • Concerns about manpower are real, but also, they’ve been that way since the jump and the fucking front line hasn’t gone anywhere. It’s possible that Ukraine will get ground down over time but it hasn’t happened yet and during the ammunition shortage would have been the most likely time for it to happen.
                • He talks about the motivation for strikes inside Russia to be “to up the ante” because Ukraine isn’t winning – it’s just a weird framing. I don’t think that is the motivation; I think Ukraine just needs to strike at forces that are attacking them instead of suddenly going hands-off as soon as something’s 5 km across the border from them.

                IDK man. I’m not convinced. Want to answer the question about movement of the front line? And is this stuff in answer to my question about where you get your information? These people are generally pretty highly qualified people in my view, yes.

                For example they were rightfully quite skeptical about the great summer offensive of 2023 whereas other sources were promising the conquest of Crimea.

                Yeah that sounds pretty accurate from what I remember of Brechner. Just like Mearsheimer he has a record of having been accurate about the future, in retrospect, which is a pretty fuckin difficult thing to do.

                • arymandias@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  Yes those are my sources and yes it is Gary Brechner aka the war nerd, he is sadly getting old but I really enjoyed his recent series on the us civil war.

                  I didn’t answer because I don’t know. I have heard it theorized that Russia is depleting the Ukrainian forces and building up behind the lines for a summer offensive, but also that the recent reshuffle of the Russian Security Council means that Putin expects the war to last until at least 2025. It is mostly speculation so not really a value add.

                  On all the details, I am just like most people dealing with limited information. And it’s hard to get a good idea what’s happening on the frontlines and on the broader strategic battle field. But there are sources I trust and sources that have shown to be at best incompetent and at worse straight up propaganda. This might be one of those rare morally uncomplicated wars, but the fact that the loudest voices in support of Israel are also oft the loudest voices in support of further escalations with Russia makes me skeptical.

                  • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    15 days ago

                    Eh

                    Russia is depleting the Ukrainian forces

                    Yeah just like the US depleted those Vietnamese forces so effectively for so long and that was the key to their victory

                    hard to get a good idea what’s happening on the frontlines

                    But surely it is possible to see which direction they are moving, or not moving, on a scale of hundreds of km over years, no? I mean you’re not obligated to actually follow through on the answer, but I think you can see what I’m getting at .

                    loudest voices in support of Israel are also oft the loudest voices in support of further escalations with Russia

                    Dude now you’re just saying talking points.

                    People on Lemmy like both Palestine and Ukraine because both of them got attacked by oppressive neighbors for basically no reason. The US State Department’s position on the two is wildly inconsistent, but the position of most human people (or most people I interact with online at least) is not.

                    “Further escalations with Russia.” One, the State Dept is actually being very careful about laying down rules for use of US arms to try to avoid escalation. I suspect that most of what you mean about escalation is “no fair fighting back!” Two, if Russia doesn’t want to get escalated against they can get the fuck out of the country and stop killing people. This crying about how everyone is being mean to them and it’s really dangerous and everyone better stop it, right now, because it’s escalation, while they are still doing their side of the fighting uninterrupted on someone else’s sovereign territory, is a bunch of shit.

                    Upset about the results of the peace talks? Pack your shit, get back across the border. Go home. There you go, peace.

                    Want no escalation? Pack your shit, get back across the border. I suspect all your oil refineries and airbases and radar stations will suddenly stop blowing up without warning which you think is so improper. Etc, etc, and so on.

                    Sorry to be rude about it again. But hey! At least I didn’t come to your country and blow up your apartment building and kill a bunch of your friends and family.