Solidarity denotes the unity and mutual support among individuals with shared objectives, crucial in protests for reinforcing collective resolve. Protests are strategically held in high-visibility, disruptive locations to maximize impact and draw public and institutional attention. This disruption compels acknowledgment of the issues, leveraging collective action to catalyze societal and political change. In contrast, low-visibility protests are often ineffective as they fail to generate sufficient public awareness or pressure for change.

  • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    26 days ago

    Doesn’t sound very peaceful and legal.

    If you really love high visibility disruptive locations, make sure you don’t end up highly visible and disrupted on my windshield.

    • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Bombing things until they got the right to vote wasn’t peaceful or legal when the suffragettes did it. If asking politely didn’t work, there’s no reason to think that asking politely but in a different place will fare any better.

      • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        26 days ago

        So you’re going to fight genocides and promote peace with bombs and killing people?

        Makes no sense. You’re insane, bro.

        • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          That worked pretty effectively in the 1940s, whereas asking the Nazis politely not to invade Poland was completely useless.

          • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            25 days ago

            True, sometimes, you have to fight fire against fire.

            But it should be the last option.

            I think peace and diplomacy should always be the priority in any situation.

    • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Why would anyone change anything for peaceful and legal protests? Significant change only happens because it is disruptive.

        • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          You mean a leader of deeply disruptive and illegal protest movements?

            • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              He was not, he was disobedient in a wildly disruptive and active manner.

              Study any civil movement in history and you’ll see that it change happened because of disruption.

                • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  It’s the opposite, you have no idea why change happens and think it’s out of the good will of the state.

                  • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    26 days ago

                    The only way to change the outside world is by changing yourself internally.

                    Gandhi actually said it himself with this famous quote: “Be the change you wish to see in the world”

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      Peaceful protests are a myth taught to you by those in power who don’t want you a protesting effectively.

      • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        Maybe, I don’t protest. Most of the time, I consider them a waste of time.

        I prefer focusing on things that I actually have control over.

        I have no control over “those in power”. Whatever that means. Just like I have no control over you. But I do vote during elections when I can.

        I’m too busy building my own business, working, taking care of myself and the people that I love.

        Whatever you’re actually trying to achieve by protesting, I always assume there’s a more effective and productive way to go about things.

      • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        “Those in power” genuinely don’t give a damn about you.

        They are too busy with their own lives.

        You’re an annoying, disruptive, incompetent and/or unproductive member of society that has nothing better to do than create problems.

        Having to use violence and chaos is a reflection of your own powerlessness and inability to be productive in a positive matter.