A new survey shows that the vast majority of senior executives say would’ve approached their return-to-work push “differently.”

  • silvercove@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I doubt it. The home network does not need to be secure. That is why you have VPNs and other such technology.

      • ngdev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In those cases it’s justifiable to have to work in-person. I don’t think we’d want closed networks (presumably for stuff like nuclear power) exposed to the open internet.

        • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, but that won’t be most of the work force. There will always be exceptions for security/defense and some other areas. I suspect those areas already had a process for monitoring the comings and goings of staff and any off-site work. I also suspect the amount of off-site work was limited to begin with if it impacted security/defense.

      • atx_aquarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Those networks are also not accessible from home networks, then. That is to say it’s a valid point regarding each industry and company having different constraints, but it’s not a concern over the security of home networks. If home/remote network security is ever the limiting concern, that can be mitigated by VPN.