• PoorlyWrittenPapyrus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    271
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    NVIDIA rep created an account to make this post

    AMD rep was already an active member of the community

    Unsurprising, yet it still speaks volumes.

        • heartlessevil@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          107
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Linux is #1 run by corporate interests like Red Hat (who controls the entire Linux ecosystem, see systemd etc.) in the exact same way as Microsoft. Linux being open source doesn’t mean it isn’t a corporate project by cumulative billion value companies. It’s not free software. It is what’s called “embrace extend extinguish”.

          In short, you can only defend Linux over Windows once Linux stops accepting patches from Microsoft.

          • mondoman712@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            58
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you don’t like Microsoft’s contributions to Linux, you can fork it and remove them. If you don’t like Microsoft’s contributions to Windows, you have to use something else.

            • Ineocla@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not just Microsoft tho. Redhat, oracle, facebook, Google, intel, AMD, they all contribute to linux. Removing their contribution would effectively make the kernel unusable

              • hglman@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                39
                ·
                1 year ago

                Isn’t taking corporate money and extracting it into a public good a positive?

              • MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                So what’s the problem with that? We get contributions for free to make newer hardware working, they improve already existing stuff, they solve bugs and everyone take advantage from that.

              • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hardware manufactures (Intel, AMD, etc) SHOULD be contributing to Linux. How could they EEE if they aren’t directly competing? The better compatibility they have with Linux, the more server CPUs they can sell. That’s their motivation, and it’s aligned with the OSS community.

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Microsoft also uses Linux. They have both Windows Subsystem for Linux, and they also use it in house I’m certain. Linux is technically competition for MS, but not really. They aren’t trying to sell Windows to the people choosing Linux. To assume malice when there’s perfectly reasonable reasons for them to be contributing is likely wrong.

          • sounddrill@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            I do not get your argument still. Could you elaborate further?

            Sure, if microsoft or redhat was embedding malware or proprietary software via patches, sure. But their contributions are also FOSS!

          • 1984@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Red hat may be a contributor to the kernel but development is open source. See the difference between American mega corp with closed source software vs red hat contributing to the Linux kernel?

            My network firewall blocks thousands of Microsoft tracking attempts per hour in my home network. My linux machine has zero packets blocked. How is this the same?

            I guess you claim it’s the same because you don’t understand the difference, or we are talking about something else being the same, like both have desktop environments…

            One is hostile against the user privacy and the other is not. They are very different. Systemd is a boot system and it’s great. It doesn’t call home.

          • moomoomoo309@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just use whatever distro Stallman does, you’ll be fine. If it’s good enough for him, it should be good enough for you.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            And how would anyone benefit if Linux stopped accepting patches from Microsoft?

  • 4ffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    172
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This might be the first time I’ve ever seen something productive happen in the Phoronix forums. I love that place. Go to any topic with more than about a dozen posts and it’s almost guaranteed to be a flame war. Genuinely one of the funniest places on the Internet.

    Check out this one. It took like three posts!

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      96
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The phoronix forums are insanely toxic. Everything is bad. Gnome = kid’s toy. systemd = written by Satan himself. Every programming language = too slow. Anything vaguely interested in fostering a diversity, equity, and inclusion = true colors come out in full force.

      It’s so toxic yet I subject myself to it every now and again. There’s absolutely no moderation going on and it shows.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s super confusing, like I feel many commenters there live in a different universe. They talk about how Wayland is a failure that has failed to get off the ground, while it’s the default in most of the major distros at this point.

          • flashgnash@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s really good so long as you aren’t trying to use it with Nvidia especially for gaming in my experience

      • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is some, but unless it gets really uncivilized no action really gets taken. a couple users have been banned

        IMO I prefer it that way myself though. you either learn something neat, or engage in a class shittery. lots of other more polite forums such as this if phoronix forums isn’t to taste

        • Backslash@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Interestingly, the guy who made the referenced post, ‘avis’, is allegedly the new name of ‘birdie’, a well-known troll on the forums who was banned a while back. Basically everyone there agrees that it’s him and no action is taken against this new account.

          • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think there is any doubt that avis is artem lol his profile even says banned in it as a joke. as long as his behavior is better, which it has been even if only marginal, there won’t be an issue. even if he does nearly single handedly cause most of the 5+ page… debates

      • GenBlob@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Once in a while I venture their forums as a morbid curiosity and it always delivers.

      • heartlessevil@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What part of any of those opinions is toxic? Lol. If your feelings get hurt because of your parasocialtechnological relationship with software you didn’t even write, take it up with your therapist.

        • LanyrdSkynrd [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did you not see how that turned from a really inconsequential disagreement to something emotional and personal almost immediately?

          Sure, no single post was particularly toxic on its own. It’s the holy war tenor of discussions on Phoronix that all but guarantees that every discussion ends up as a flame war.

        • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Anything vaguely interested in fostering a diversity, equity, and inclusion = true colors come out in full force.

          if you don’t understand how this is toxic then you are dumb as dogshit

      • orangeboats@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Any “X11 vs Wayland” discussion will eventually devolve into a fight beteeen diehard X11 fans and diehard Wayland fans, lol.

        • BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t even understand how Wayland has diehard fans. Do they just exit out from their hyperland rice into an X11 session whenever they need to share their screen during a Teams meeting, or do they just say “if it doesn’t work on Wayland it sucks and I don’t use it”.

          • pitbuster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Although, screen sharing has been solved a while ago. Any application that doesn’t work is because the developers are shit (I am looking into you, zoom and you half-assed implementation using an screenshot-API-based gnome-only implementation).

    • Backslash@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Especially when the original article is about anything related to Rust. An hour after the article is live you’ll have 50 posts arguing and trolling like there’s nothing more important in the whole wide world. So entertaining!

  • silvercove@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is how the rest of the industry worked for years. Nvidia was just stuck in the past century.

  • azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    NVIDIA is finally starting to play nicely with the community to help sort the driver mess out. Nouveau paired with NVK might actually be the future of NVIDIA graphics under Linux!

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Might make me consider buying an Nvidia card in the future if they can get a reasonably performing and reliable in-kernel driver.

      • orangeboats@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I still won’t buy one just because of this news - they have done lots, lots of shitty things in the past. GameWorks, PhysX, Geforce Partnership Program, etc. While AMD is not exactly a saint when it comes to open sourcing, they still commit far more than Nvidia to open standards.

      • aard@kyu.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’ve been dicks for two decades, just playing a bit nicee doesn’t really change anything. If they work properly with open source, and enable proper in kernel drivers for the next decade or so I might consider buying something nvidia.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nvidia has burned their reputation… Will take years to regain trust.

        They are responsible for almost all issues new people have with Linux.

        • UnPassive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          AMD GPUs have open source linux drivers meaning no extra configuration is needed on install. Some linux distros make setting up Nvidia really easy, but I ran into problems years ago. I think Nvidia is theoretically releasing open source drivers soon though

        • phx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like a specific GPU or brand?

          Most AMD stuff is pretty solid using the AMDGPU driver, including stuff from the RX4xx series onward plus various APU’s pretty my own experience.

          Intel stuff is usually ok but I’ve run into some weirdness with the Atom and some other stuff with integrated graphics

          • bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not true, AMD works out of the box with almost every distro. Nvidia doesn’t work out of the box on a lot (Debian for example)

            • BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nvidia doesn’t work out of the box on a lot (Debian for example)

              But it DOES work. Debian/Arch/etc push the responsibility to the user to finish setting things up (kernel command lines, drivers, etc). How exactly is that an Nvidia problem and not just distros sticking it to their users resulting in user anger towards Nvidia?

              Nothing “works out of the box” on an operating system without the OS installation process using auto-detection to guide the users through the additional steps required to setup WiFi, Bluetooth, etc. Yet for some reason when it comes to hardware GPU acceleration, the Linux distro response is just “fuck, Nvidia? figure it out yourself, I can’t be arsed to add the required config files and kernel command params”.

            • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It does work with the nouveau driver and will display your desktop just fine.

              If you want to play GTA, just add the nVidia repo that literally every distribution has.

    • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If part of their job is working with the OSS community I don’t see anything wrong (and I just finished my annual training a few weeks ago, so it’s still fresh in my mind).

      Edit: keeping an “official” repo secret does seem like an issue, but public posts about the correct process to contribute upstream doesn’t seem like a problem.

  • Anon819450514@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does that mean we’ll get more and better firmware updates? Please explain like I’m no firmware dev.

    • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nzM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not really. Instead of dumping all the drivers into one repo, there’s now a separate repo just for GPU drivers, which is just a staging area, before they get merged into the main repo.

      If you ask “why”? It’s like creating an extra folder so that your files are organized better.

      As an end user, it’s not going to change anything for us.

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        It does mean you are more likely to get eyeballs on your driver from other people doing graphics card driver work. That usually results in higher quality and a higher likelihood of catching issues.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Only if they know about the repo, and apparently the Nvidia employee responsible for submitting patches upstream didn’t.

          Maybe that’s why their drivers are so bad? /s