Hi all,

Oftentimes, video files I download only include six-channel audio (i.e. 5.1). Using Tdarr, I transcode the video files and create a stereo audio channel from the surround channel.

At present, qBittorrent seems to seed these re-encoded files without complaint but if I force a recheck, it’ll overwrite my newly-encoded files with the original. I’m concerned that my seeding these altered files is ‘harming’ the pool somehow but I am not sure?

An easy solution to this would be to keep two copies of each re-encoded file on my hard drive, so I watch the version with the stereo audio and seed the original. However, I do not have a lot of storage and would ideally minimize the copies I have of each file.

So, to sum-up, I suppose my question is: am I harming the torrent pool by seeding these altered versions? Or, if I want to be a responsible torrenter, do I need to keep duplicate versions, at least until my share ratio is 1:1?

Thanks.

EDIT:

Thank you to all those who took the time to comment and upvote. I’ve setup a ‘pipeline’ for seeding unaltered originals.

  • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
    492·
    2 months ago

    I’m concerned that my seeding these altered files is ‘harming’ the pool somehow

    It 100% is. STOP DOING THIS. You are NOT seeding the original files. You are 100% poisoning the swarm. You WILL get banned, and it will be your own fault.

    • krolden@lemmy.mlEnglish
      17·
      2 months ago

      Wouldn’t the checksums break the torrent anyway and attempt to fix by redownloading

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      9·
      2 months ago

      If someone inadvertently did this because they recently started transcoding their media library (…that would be me…), and didn’t think about the seeding torrents, can you do anything to mitigate such bans?

    • WatTyler@lemmy.zipOPEnglish
      8·
      2 months ago

      My apologies. I can’t say I’ve done this a lot, as I’ve always been concerned this was the case. I’ve made the necessary adjustments.