I was wondering what happened to the proposal from a month ago…

  • idefix@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t understand the simpler argument. Installing and using extensions and gnome-tweaks to change basic settings is not simpler. And I strongly dislike a large number of defaults.

    With KDE Plasma, defaults make more sense to me so I barely have to change configuration. If I really need to, the setting is there and easily used.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Since KDE changed to dbl-click by default, the only thing I change is Numlock on boot. 10 seconds to fix, and I know it’ll stay changed because KDE is allergic to removing user settings.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      KDE is not good for stability and control. It is consumer oriented instead of enterprise oriented.

      There isn’t anything wrong with the KDE spin. If you want KDE it is available and well supported.

      • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Wait are you saying is Gnome is better for enterprise environments cause it’s harder for the users to mess things up? If so, yeah I can see that. It’s perfect for the simple-minded. Not saying that all Gnomes are simpletons, just that I too would rather have some boomers Gnome.