Isn’t that a prerequisite for enshitification? Publicly-traded companies are required (by law, I think) to maximize profits for their shareholders, even if that means utterly ruining their original product (Reddit, Boeing, etc.), yes? What do you think?

  • Hegar@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “Because” often doesn’t make sense in the real world where anything that happens is the sum total of multiple factors. Especially a trend as broad as enshitification.

    Being publicly traded seems like a contributing factor, but a sole owner can still enshitify through greed or incompetence.

    I would guess that market consolidation and low competition are more of a factor.

    • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s also the anti commodity stuff IP has been allowing. If Hershey makes crap chocolate, there is little stopping you from buying Lidnt say. But if Microsoft makes a bad OS, there’s a lot stopping you from using Linux or whatever.

      What’s worse is stuff like DRM and computers getting into equipment that otherwise you could use any of a bevy of products for. Think ink cartridges.

      Then there’s the secret formulas like for transmission fluid now where say Honda says in the manual you have to get Honda fluid for it to keep working. Idk if it’s actually true, but I l’m loathe to do the 8k USD experiment with my transmission.

      You’d think the government could mandate standards but we don’t have stuff like that.