• balderdash@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Remember in grammar school when your teacher told you that Wikipedia is not a valid source? I’m sure they’re saying the same thing about AI right now.

    • uzay@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      3 months ago

      The difference being that on wikipedia you could use the sources on there while AI makes those up as well

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        A more important reason is teachers let you use Wikipedia sources, while even valid ai content is “not your work”

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 months ago

          I remember an AI that wrote a legal motion and justified its arguments by citing cases it made up.

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            I mean, of course. For the record, that wasn’t the type that cites its sources intrinsically as part of its response creation process, although it wouldn’t be immune to hallucinations even if it was.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, and I have to practice mental arithmetic because I won’t always have a calculator in my pocket.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean if all the screenshots people take with their battery in the corner at 1% is any indication, you won’t always have one lol