“The posts that were removed were all actioned correctly,” says Joe Benarroch, head of business operations at X, adding that the posts violated the company’s “posting private information policy” for “outing the identity of an anonymous user.”
While X does have a policy around sharing private information, the company’s terms of service on March 20 did not mention a policy related to outing the identity of an anonymous user, and Benarroch did not respond to a request for clarification. On March 21, after WIRED published this story, X updated its privacy policy to specifically prohibit posting the ”the identity of an anonymous user, such as their name or media depicting them.”
Was it illegal to do what they did to the guy? Thats the only reason Elon says he would ever take any content down from X
They made a new policy just for him!
How long until PG ignores that rule when some normal, non-Nazi gets doxxed? I give it maybe 2 mooches.
Am I understanding that acronym correctly?
Americans and their mooches. Why not join the rest world and tell time the correct, lettuces.
So The
New YorkTimes will be banned with extreme prejudice for doxxing F1nn5ter the other day, right Anakin?Anakin?
That didn’t sound right - it was The Times!
And of course ;)
Lmao
Kinda surprising they didn’t have a doxxing policy prior to this, no?
Free speech1