• fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s not gatekeeping. Gatekeeping would be: you guys shouldn’t go to libraries because reasons. Im merely expressing an opinion that few people here seem to know what happens in libraries.

    Case in point:

    […] a quiet, private place.

    This doesn’t really describe a library in 2024. I’m sure there are some libraries in which talking and interacting is still discouraged, but that’s not the norm in my experience.

    • Sentrovasi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Why I think it’s gatekeeping:

      You’re essentially implying people haven’t been in libraries by your last sentence if they haven’t seen what you’ve seen. That’s gatekeeping, like it or not.

      EDIT: In case it isn’t clear, what you said was essentially:

      “You’re not a library-goer because [reasons].”

      That’s gatekeeping, my person.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nonsense. Lets not co-opt “gatekeeping” to cover any sort of attitude we find distasteful, shall we?

        Looking at a bunch of definitions of gatekeeping the closest I can find is this:

        gatekeeping refers to the actions of individuals or groups who try to define what is and isn’t acceptable within a particular community and determine who is and isn’t allowed to participate.

        My assertion:

        I kinda wonder how much time other commenter here have spent at their libraries.

        You really can’t co-opt that into the definition of gatekeeping.

        • Sentrovasi@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You’re the one who’s disqualifying people from saying what libraries look like because they don’t share your common experience. Have a little self-awareness.