• pjhenry1216@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t see how it doesn’t violate free speech. Imagine needing the government’s permission to talk to someone?

    Edit: forgot a word

    • Sylver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. Even internet security protocols are at risk, and the dinosaurs responsible for writing laws don’t understand basic encryption let alone the idea that it is 100% a needed concept in a free, fair, and just society.

    • phillaholic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are already age limitations that are constitutional. You can’t run for office, buy alcohol, drive a car etc.