seth@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · edit-23 months agoC++ creator rebuts White House warningwww.infoworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up1157arrow-down112file-textcross-posted to: cpp@programming.dev
arrow-up1145arrow-down1external-linkC++ creator rebuts White House warningwww.infoworld.comseth@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · edit-23 months agomessage-square98fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: cpp@programming.dev
minus-squareSuperb@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·3 months agoWhy can’t it be both a condemnation of C++ AND an inevitable consequence of success? C++ was a success, but we’ve learned a lot and it’s time to move on
minus-squaremox@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down3·3 months agoCondemning apples for having seeds doesn’t make a reasonable case for choosing other fruit, which also have seeds.
minus-squareSuperb@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squaresnowe@programming.devMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·3 months agoit does if the other ones have edible seeds, seeds without arsenic, or fewer seeds… your analogy makes no sense.
Why can’t it be both a condemnation of C++ AND an inevitable consequence of success? C++ was a success, but we’ve learned a lot and it’s time to move on
Condemning apples for having seeds doesn’t make a reasonable case for choosing other fruit, which also have seeds.
deleted by creator
it does if the other ones have edible seeds, seeds without arsenic, or fewer seeds… your analogy makes no sense.