0x2d@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 months agorulelemmy.mlimagemessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1721arrow-down10
arrow-up1721arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.ml0x2d@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 months agomessage-square48fedilink
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·4 months agoC===3 needs some kind of javascriot explanation.
minus-squareKrokanteBamischijf@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-24 months agoC===3 // likely to be false, depending on type of C C==3 // likely to be true, depending on value of C How you interpret this information is on you. Also please note that below statement is valid Javascript. That is all. UwU? “What’s this” :3
minus-squarejballs@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 months agoDid you just prove that short dicks evaluate as true?
minus-squareKrokanteBamischijf@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoIf someone has you wondering if they’re compensating for something, it’s probably true.
C===3 needs some kind of javascriot explanation.
C===3 // likely to be false, depending on type of C
C==3 // likely to be true, depending on value of C
How you interpret this information is on you. Also please note that below statement is valid Javascript. That is all. UwU? “What’s this” :3
Did you just prove that short dicks evaluate as true?
If someone has you wondering if they’re compensating for something, it’s probably true.